Regulating GMO Seeds

Tom Philpott over at Grist has written a post complaining about the USDA allowing proponents to fund environmental assessment studies required to satisfy Environmental Impact Assessment regulations.
In early April, the USDA made what I'm reading as a second response to Judge White, this one even more craven. To satisfy the legal system's pesky demand for environmental impact studies of novel GMO crops, the USDA has settled upon a brilliant solution: let the GMO industry conduct its own environmental impact studies, or pay other researchers to.
His complaint makes for a nice sound bite.  However, if he is going to prevent GMO technology developers from sponsoring environmental impact analysis, is he proposing to prohibit that practice in the pharmaceutical sector?  Should new drugs be held off the market until government researchers get around to conducting their own research on the safety of new medications?
Published on April 19, 2011

Tom Philpott over at Grist has written a post complaining about the USDA allowing proponents to fund environmental assessment studies required to satisfy Environmental Impact Assessment regulations.

In early April, the USDA made what I’m reading as a second response to Judge White, this one even more craven. To satisfy the legal system’s pesky demand for environmental impact studies of novel GMO crops, the USDA has settled upon a brilliant solution: let the GMO industry conduct its own environmental impact studies, or pay other researchers to.

His complaint makes for a nice sound bite.  However, if he is going to prevent
GMO technology developers from sponsoring environmental impact analysis, is he proposing to prohibit that practice in the pharmaceutical sector?  Should new drugs be held off the market until government researchers get around to conducting their own research on the safety of new medications?

Indeed, the list of potential offenders in Tom’s mind is much more extensive.  For example, should proponents proposing to construct wind farms be prevented from sponsoring the research needed to support an impact assessment?  Should conservation agencies that invest in wetland restoration work be prevented from sponsoring research related to the environmental and health impacts of their projects?

The concept of proponents conducting or sponsoring research required to comply with environmental impact assessment regulations is well established in both Canada and the USA.  There is no reason why GMO technology developers should be treated any different than proponents from other sectors of the economy.

 

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Black on Canada’s Proud Black History

Black on Canada’s Proud Black History

Did you learn any Black history in Black History Month? February came and went in Canada with few high-profile offerings, except a nod to a pioneering black athlete there and a slogan or commercial there. Black organizations sued the Canadian Human Rights Commission...

Why Are Canadian Home Prices So High?

Why Are Canadian Home Prices So High?

In the last 8 years, we have seen home costs double across Canada. There are many reasons for the rise in prices and it is difficult to connect the increases to just one particular reason. In your opinion how would you rank the reasons listed below as the main causes...