Anti-Parental Rights Rhetoric Undermines Public Education

The debate over parental rights has become a flashpoint in the upcoming Manitoba provincial election. The Progressive Conservatives are promising to strengthen parental rights while the Liberals and NDP have […]
Published on September 23, 2023

The debate over parental rights has become a flashpoint in the upcoming Manitoba provincial election. The Progressive Conservatives are promising to strengthen parental rights while the Liberals and NDP have both denounced this pledge as a “dog whistle” to bigots.

One reason this debate is so heated is because of what is happening in other provinces. For example, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe are taking considerable heat for requiring schools to obtain parental consent before using different pronouns for students under the age of 16.

It should come as little surprise that Manitoba’s woke ideologues are desperate to stop this province from following their example.

As a case in point, Winnipeg Free Press columnist Dan Lett recently denounced parental rights as “hate masquerading as a motherhood issue.” Meanwhile, organizers with the group People for Public Education published an op-ed calling the parental rights pledge a Trojan Horse that must be stopped.

Interestingly, these attacks ignore the fact that protecting parental rights has overwhelming public support. For example, an Angus Reid survey last month revealed that 76 per cent of Manitobans think that parents should at least be informed if their children assume a new gender identity at school. Survey results in other provinces showed similar levels of support.

Simply put, opponents of parental rights are swimming against the tide of public opinion. Most Canadians hold the commonsense view that parents, not school officials, are the primary educators of their children. This means that they expect schools to share important information about their children—not hide it.

As for “grassroots” organizations such as People for Public Education, a quick perusal of their website shows that they are made up almost entirely of education professors, teachers, and school trustees. Thus, it would be more truthful to call them Public Educators for Public Education. They are certainly not speaking on behalf of ordinary parents and their claims should be taken with a grain of salt.

A common line used by critics is that it’s more important to protect the rights of children than to protect the rights of parents. After all, they argue, children are not the property of their parents. The Toronto Star even went as far as publishing an op-ed titled “It’s a privilege, not a right, to know your kid’s gender identity.”

However, this claim essentially turns children into wards of the state. The moment that schools are allowed to hide information from parents in the name of children’s rights is the moment when the state has assumed the role of parent. There is no faster way to undermine trust in public education than to assume that parents cannot be trusted with information about their own children.

Parents expect public schools to provide students with a solid education in the academic basics. When schools depart from their primary mission, they risk destroying trust with the communities they serve. Public schools are supposed to work with parents, not undermine their authority.

When Manitobans go to the polls on October 3, they need to think carefully about what kind of public education system they want to have. When it comes to their own children, parents must always be kept in the loop.

Any party that refuses to respect the rights of parents doesn’t deserve to form government.



Michael Zwaagstra is a public high school teacher and a Senior Fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy

Featured News


In Case of Emergency, Read This! Alberta’s Covid-19 Report

In Case of Emergency, Read This! Alberta’s Covid-19 Report

Despite the wreckage wrought by the Covid-19 pandemic – social disintegration, ruined lives, physical and economic tolls – the governments and public officials who “managed” the emergency have been decidedly uninterested in assessing their performance. Except in Alberta, where a government-appointed panel just released its Final Report. Though predictably attacked by politicians, media and “experts” who can abide no dissent, the report makes many sensible recommendations, Barry Cooper finds. The report calls for emergency management experts – not doctors or health care bureaucrats – to be in charge when such disasters strike, with politicians who are accountable to the people making the key decisions. Most important, the report demands much stronger protection for the individual freedoms that panic-stricken governments and overbearing professional organizations so readily quashed.

How “Woke-ism” Threatens Academic Freedom

How “Woke-ism” Threatens Academic Freedom

In November 2022, Paul Viminitz, a professor in the philosophy department at the University of Lethbridge, invited me to give a talk on the threat “woke-ism” poses for academic freedom. After pressure mounted to cancel the talk, the president of the University of...

Higher Interest Rates May Make Productivity Higher Too

Higher Interest Rates May Make Productivity Higher Too

It is taking a while, but a prolonged period of elevated interest rates, at both the short end set by the Bank of Canada and the Federal Reserve Board of the United States, and at the long end in the bond market set by domestic and foreign investors, is coming to be...