Big Government Not Better

The economy of scale principle does not apply to governments because governments are pyramid organizations built on layer upon expanding layer of management as the organization grows.

Ron Joseph’s Tuesday letter to the editor (“Overhaul Municipal Fiefdoms”) is a regurgitation of an old assumption that municipal amalgamations reduce costs.

That myth has been debunked many times in studies and analyses of municipal mergers (e.g., Andrew Sancton, University of Western Ontario, “Merger Mania: The Assault on Local Government,” 2000; Wendell Cox, Frontier Centre for Public Policy, “Reassessing Local Government Amalgamation,” 2003).

Canadian municipal amalgamations have produced results very much at odds with self-serving predictions made by agenda-driven proponents. The Winnipeg amalgamation, over 30 years ago, and more recent amalgamations in Halifax, Ottawa, Hamilton, and Toronto produced identical predictable results: bigger governments are less effective, less efficient, and more expensive than smaller governments.

The economy of scale principle does not apply to governments because governments are pyramid organizations built on layer upon expanding layer of management as the organization grows. The council at the top of the pyramid is not what determines the cost of government. That cost is determined by the distance separating the chief administrative officer from the snowplow operator.

In a municipality such as Montrose, that distance is covered in one step. The larger the municipality, the more layers of administrators, managers, supervisors and foremen, all with their assistants, deputies and secretaries, and the more staff meeting time dedicated to coordinate policies and activities.

The bigger the municipality the taller the pyramid and the greater the cost of overhead for every kilometre driven by every snowplow operator.

The above-mentioned and other studies on the subject do not make assumptions; they provide irrefutable evidence that big government does not equate efficient government. (If it were so, the federal government would be a model of efficiency). Ron Joseph’s advice should not be taken for gospel; consult the research instead.

André Carrel
Terrace, B.C.

Editor’s note: Andre Carrel is a former administrator for several local municipalities

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Malign Neglect: What Calgary’s Water-Main Break Reveals about the Failure of City Government

Malign Neglect: What Calgary’s Water-Main Break Reveals about the Failure of City Government

The rupture of Calgary’s biggest water main revealed more than the problems of aging infrastructure. It showed a civic bureaucracy unable to provide basic services or fix things when they break, and a mayor eager to blame others and scold citizens for their selfishness in wanting city services in return for their tax dollars. Above all, it laid bare the increasing tendency of governments to neglect their core responsibilities in favour of social policy fetishes, and to sidestep accountability when things go wrong. Clear, competent, mission-focused public servants are a vanishing breed, writes George Koch, and governing a city is now mainly about keeping city workers, senior officials and elected politicians happy.

Toronto, Vancouver Named ‘Impossibly Unaffordable’

Toronto, Vancouver Named ‘Impossibly Unaffordable’

While Vancouver can be beautiful, it has also been deemed the most unaffordable city in Canada by a Demographia International Housing Affordability report and the third-least affordable city of the 94 markets analyzed in the report.

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...