Manitoba Government Spending Rising Rapidly

FC077
Published on May 13, 2013

With provincial government expenditures rising far in excess of inflation since 1999, Manitoba does not have a case for raising any of its taxes, which are among the highest in Canada. The province clearly has a spending problem, not a lack of revenue problem, and simply needs to manage spending in more innovative and smarter ways.

  • In Fiscal Year 1999/2000, Manitoba’s government spent $6, 379 per resident of the province. By 2011/2012, per capita spending had grown in nominal terms to $11, 867. This represents an increase in government spending per capita of 86 per cent.
  • This growth in per-capita government spending has been much faster than the rate of inflation during the same period. This means that “real spending” per capita in Manitoba has been growing steadily.
  • The fact that government spending growth has outstripped inflation has punched a hole in the provincial government’s finances. If per-person provincial government spending since 1999 had been held to the rate of inflation, the province would now be saving billions of dollars per year.
  • In fact, if per person government spending growth were held to the rate of inflation, Manitoba’s spending in 2011/2012 would have totaled just $10.7 billion. Instead, thanks to faster-than-inflation spending growth over more than a decade, Manitoba spent $14.8 billion in that fiscal year.
  • If Manitoba had held per-capita spending growth to the rate of inflation since 1999/2000, the province would have saved $4.1 billion in the last fiscal year alone. By holding real per capita spending constant during the time period examined here, the government could have saved $22.2 billion compared to what was actually spent between 1999 and today.
  • One factor that has fuelled spending growth in Manitoba is large cash transfers from the Federal government. In 1999 transfer payments accounted for just over 28% of Manitoba’s revenue – in 2012, this number has increased to 31%.
  • In addition to federal transfers, another factor that has caused the deficit to swell has been the government’s willingness to take on new debt. Government debt grew from $10 billion in 1999 to about $23 billion in 2012.
  • If the government had managed to hold per-capita spending growth to the rate of inflation, the savings would have been equivalent to the entire amount of personal income tax paid by Manitobans in the 2011/2012 fiscal year.
  • With government expenditure rising 86% above the 1999/2000 base year, the provincial government does not have a case for raising any of its taxes.  Manitoba clearly has a spending problem, not a lack of revenue problem and simply needs to manage expenditures so they are more in line with normal economic growth.

Read in PDF format here.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has recently announced its intention to mount a constitutional challenge relating to equalization. This decision has been justified by arguments that are not accurate and displays a lack of understanding of the...

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...

Canada Now has the Third Highest Global Capital Gains Tax Rate

Canada Now has the Third Highest Global Capital Gains Tax Rate

Canada Now has the Third Highest Global Capital Gains Tax Rate   The April 16th federal budget increased Canada’s inclusion rate for capital gains, sharply moving Canada up in the effective marginal capital gains tax rate versus rival nations. According to...