A New Model for Funding Public Transit: Embracing the User-Pays Principle

Public transportation is an important contributor to urban mobility, particularly in Canada’s largest metropolitan areas. Despite the fact that most residents view public transportation as a necessity, there is a […]
Published on December 15, 2015

Public transportation is an important contributor to urban mobility, particularly in Canada’s largest metropolitan areas. Despite the fact that most residents view public transportation as a necessity, there is a tendency to think of it as more of a social welfare program than as a viable option for people who can afford to drive. This is, in part, because of the way that public transit agencies are organized. They are run as money-losing government departments that struggle to meet their bare obligations, let alone attract “choice” riders with better service. This creates a Catch 22: residents who do not use public transportation are often reluctant to fund large capital expansions, and existing riders are often opposed to paying higher fares. This can lead to an under-investment in public transit agencies that perpetuates the stereotype that riding the bus is a last resort for those who cannot afford to drive.

While public transportation has become a major political issue in Canada, pouring more money into public transportation will not necessarily result in substantially better public transportation. This paper will argue that how public transportation agencies collect revenue and the processes by which they decide how to spend their revenue is nearly as important as how much they collect and spend. Rather than simply funneling more money into transit agencies as they stand, governments should convert public transportation agencies into autonomous Crown corporations. This would remove much of the politicization surrounding public transportation decisions, shifting the priority to increasing ridership rather than cutting ribbons.

Lafleur – New Model for Funding Public Transit.pdf

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...

Don’t Be Fooled by High-Speed Rail

Don’t Be Fooled by High-Speed Rail

The Canadian government is considering spending $6 billion to $12 billion to introduce what it calls “high-frequency trains” between Toronto and Quebec City. Though some media reports have described these as high-speed trains (which generally means trains capable of...