A New Approach to Stopping Climate Change

When creative intellect, left wing politics, and sexuality meet, the bizarre is sure to follow, even if it gets few followers. Take the ecosexual movement, pioneered by California PhDs Annie […]
Published on December 7, 2019

When creative intellect, left wing politics, and sexuality meet, the bizarre is sure to follow, even if it gets few followers. Take the ecosexual movement, pioneered by California PhDs Annie Sprinkle and Beth Stephens. In 2016, they penned the Ecosexual Manifesto. Maybe the earth was screwed before, but this couple wants to work it over in ways that farmers never did.

“We make love with the earth,” the manifesto reads. “We shamelessly hug trees, massage the earth with our feet, and talk erotically to plants . . . We caress rocks, are pleasured by waterfalls, and admire the Earth’s curves often.”

You don’t say.

The document insists ecosexuals are “a rapidly growing community” that includes “nature fetishists, . . . critters and other entities.” They are “activists” who will save the planet through “love, joy, and . . . seduction,” but also by “anarchist and radical environmental activist strategies.” 

Furthermore, “Ecosexual is an identity. For some of us being ecosexual is our primary (sexual) identity . . . We are polymorphous and pollen-amorous.”

You can even betroth yourself to the earth until death do you meet with the ecosexual pledge: “I promise to love, honor and cherish you Earth, until death brings us closer together forever.”

In one amazing swoop, pagan spiritism, earth worship, environmental activism, untethered eroticism, and necromancy all come together.

There was no one better to invent ecosexuality than Annie Sparkle, partly because she came closer than most of us to screwing the entire world. She was born Ellen Steinberg in 1954 but took Annie Sprinkle as her porn name before making 200 adult films. She fell in love with Gerard Damiano, director of Deep Throat, followed him to New York as his mistress, and engaged in almost 20 years of prostitution. Sprinkle later became a performance artist, visual artist, filmmaker, author, and sex educator.

Sprinkle married her lesbian lover Beth Stephens in Toronto in 2007. Since then the couple has conducted 18 ecosexual art weddings, and “married the Earth, Sky, Sea, Moon, Appalachian Mountains, the Sun, and other non-human entities in nine different countries.”

Ecosexuality, for its pretentious claims as a sexual orientation, is more about art. Another manifestation came in 2016, thanks to an Australian-American duo called Pony Express. The Royal Botanic Gardens in Melbourne housed the Ecosexual Bathhouse. Vice magazine called it, “a pretty wild experiment in experiential art” and a “provocative twist on . . . queer and environmental activism.”

In one of those twists, participants use condoms to facilitate sexual reproduction instead of preventing it. Australian news was told, “people have to slip a condom over their finger before they stroke the flowers” so their threesome doesn’t interfere with pollination.

It only got weirder from there in this exhibit that was more exhibitionist than most. Where else could someone find “a composting glory hole, bee BDSM, and sprouting panties”? Most memorable is this depiction in Vice courtesy of Olivia Parkes.

The resident shape-shifting dominatrix cruises audience members as they migrate through the rooms, taking them back to her lair to deliver them dances based on their accessories. The performances range from perplexing to perverse—the SSD may make a frantic offering of blue objects, piling them around the viewer in mimicry of bowerbird courtship, or deliver a melancholy, undulating interpretation of slug sex, trailing her hapless partner with ultraviolent goo. If you’re wearing the Paw, the SSD will tie you to a rock like Andromeda and, clad in a snakeskin bodysuit and a ring-gag, perform her slithering dance and drool all over you: a snake preparing to digest her prey.

Too bad I missed it!

Ecosexuality got a later, smaller, orgasm courtesy of Sophie Gallagher in the Huffington Post. She rehashed content from Google, Teen Vogue, and other sources to write, “EcoSexuality: 7 Things You Need To Know About This Sexual Identity.” Point four was that “Ecosexuality isn’t just a hobby . . . it is an identity equal to being gay or bisexual,” something that should be taken about as seriously as point three: “Ecosexuality is a new approach to stopping climate change.”(Gallagher has since told us about a Sex Unicorn. This seems unaptly named, since it refers to a bisexual woman invited to a heterosexual bedroom. Is it because the man gets horn-again?)

Follow the endless sexual orientations and gender identities to the extreme, and it becomes, as Jordan Peterson termed it, “a parody.” People can name themselves a pan-sexual, an omnisexual, a skoliosexual, or anything else. It becomes a fallacious (though not necessarily fellating) mirage. A person can pride themselves on their self-definition, but should they change their mind or preference, it’s not actually binding. It’s as passing as a one-night stand or a faddish art exhibit.

The final irony is that heterosexuality, not ecosexuality, pays the best respect to nature. Heterosexual sex is the dominant expression of all mammals and the only way they will ever reproduce. Lay the anti-human, Malthusian ideas of modern environmentalism aside. “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the whole earth,” remains far better than screwing the planet itself.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

Most Canadians are unaware that a campaign to remake Canada is underway. The conception of that most Canadians have of their country - that it is, one nation, in which citizens of different ethnic, religious and racial groups are all treated equally, under one set of...

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has recently announced its intention to mount a constitutional challenge relating to equalization. This decision has been justified by arguments that are not accurate and displays a lack of understanding of the...

It Seems We Are Far Too Canadian; Yet Not Canadian Enough

It Seems We Are Far Too Canadian; Yet Not Canadian Enough

Oh, Canada. You have been too nice.  Too kind.  Too silent. For too long. And now a noisy minority is undermining our country’s values, laws and institutions. Protestors have taken over many university campuses and they are fomenting hatred toward Jews and Israel. Few...