The Loss of Trust in Mainstream Media During COVID-19: Jeffrey Tucker’s Testimony

Jeffrey A. Tucker, the founder and president of Brownstone Institute
Published on April 25, 2023

Jeffrey A. Tucker, is the president of the Brownstone Institute, the world’s leading think tank on the Covid 19 policy file.  On April 14th, 2023 he testified to the National Citizens Inquiry on COVID-19 hearings in Winnipeg.  He explained how the mainstream media’s uniformity of opinion forces people to turn to other platforms for a wider view.  According to Tucker, the internet replaced print media over the last 25 years, and the industry reorganized so that even local media was dependent on centralized media sources which left them with little independence. Tucker claimed that citizen journalism on platforms like Substack and Twitter is now the only place where independent news reporting happens. He stated that controlling the news has become crucial to corrupt bureaucracies and governments, becoming most obvious during the recent pandemic period. Tucker also criticized media for self-censorship, not drawing any connection to lockdowns and public health responses. He further suggested that governments should remove national security controls over big media venues, but they are conflicted because antitrust authorities in any country are not interested in breaking up big media because it serves their interests. Testimony can be viewed here (30 minutes)

Frontier Centre Covid-related publications and media

Brownstone at Frontier Centre

Share | Email | Print

Featured News


In Case of Emergency, Read This! Alberta’s Covid-19 Report

In Case of Emergency, Read This! Alberta’s Covid-19 Report

Despite the wreckage wrought by the Covid-19 pandemic – social disintegration, ruined lives, physical and economic tolls – the governments and public officials who “managed” the emergency have been decidedly uninterested in assessing their performance. Except in Alberta, where a government-appointed panel just released its Final Report. Though predictably attacked by politicians, media and “experts” who can abide no dissent, the report makes many sensible recommendations, Barry Cooper finds. The report calls for emergency management experts – not doctors or health care bureaucrats – to be in charge when such disasters strike, with politicians who are accountable to the people making the key decisions. Most important, the report demands much stronger protection for the individual freedoms that panic-stricken governments and overbearing professional organizations so readily quashed.