Media Release: Short-term Costs for Long-term Finality

First Nations and Canadian taxpayers need a new expedited approach that prioritizes specific land claims and moves towards a final filing deadline.
Published on November 20, 2008

WINNIPEG, MB – First Nation communities need a new expedited approach to resolving specific land claims dispute that is more ambitious than the Conservative government’s new specific claims tribunal legislation, according to a new background paper from the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

In his paper, Settling Old Debts: A Plan for Expediting Canada’s Land Claims Process, Frontier Centre policy analyst Joseph Quesnel argues that despite the welcome presence of a new independent tribunal to handle specific claims, Canada should establish a “sunset clause” that ensures the number of claims are finally filed in totality, and then dealt with within a reasonable amount of time. This would be in the interests of both First Nations and taxpayers, argues Quesnel.

“To be just to First Nations, it would make sense to provide a generous, but firm, filing deadline,” says Quesnel.

The paper argues that the federal government should view claims as a top priority, not only because they are outstanding moral and legal obligations to First Nations, but they also represent significant liabilities that do not allow Aboriginal communities to focus on other central issues, such as economic development and socio-economic improvement, as well as eventual self-government.

To download a copy of the report, click here.

Contact:
Joseph Quesnel
Frontier Centre for Public Policy
403-381-0342 (Office)
403-360-3078 (Cell)
quesnelj@fcpp.org

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Malign Neglect: What Calgary’s Water-Main Break Reveals about the Failure of City Government

Malign Neglect: What Calgary’s Water-Main Break Reveals about the Failure of City Government

The rupture of Calgary’s biggest water main revealed more than the problems of aging infrastructure. It showed a civic bureaucracy unable to provide basic services or fix things when they break, and a mayor eager to blame others and scold citizens for their selfishness in wanting city services in return for their tax dollars. Above all, it laid bare the increasing tendency of governments to neglect their core responsibilities in favour of social policy fetishes, and to sidestep accountability when things go wrong. Clear, competent, mission-focused public servants are a vanishing breed, writes George Koch, and governing a city is now mainly about keeping city workers, senior officials and elected politicians happy.