What Saved the Bloc Quebecois in the 2008 Election: Public Money

Over the past several decades, there have been several key changes to how Canada’s federal political parties are funded. The most recent and significant changes took effect in 2004 with federal legislation (Bill C-24, passed in 2003) which banned corporate and union donations.
Published on October 23, 2008

 

Taxpayer subsidies for political parties since 2000: $313 million

Over the past several decades, there have been several key changes to how Canada’s federal political parties are funded. The most recent and significant changes took effect in 2004 with federal legislation (Bill C-24, passed in 2003) which banned corporate and union donations. That legislative change also limited personal donations to $5,000 per individual donor. Effective in 2007, that limit was lowered by the new Conservative government to $1,100 per individual, per year, adjusted annually for inflation. That limit also applies to candidates in federal ridings.

In addition to the 2004 ban on union and corporate donations, the 2004 changes also provided for increased public — i.e., taxpayer-financed — subsidies to political parties. In particular, existing public subsidies to parties and candidates were increased and a new subsidy introduced:

Results of 2004 and subsequent changes:

Political parties are reimbursed for 50% of their election
expenses
(compared to 22.5% previously);

Candidates are reimbursed for 60% of their election expenses (compared to 50% previously);

A new annual “allowance” was created for political parties based on the number of votes cast for each party in the most recent federal election. The legislation provides for inflation adjustments. As of October 2008, a registered political party receives the equivalent of just over $1.95, annually, for each vote received in the previous election, an amount that is paid in quarterly instalments.

For example, if Party “X” received 1,000,000 votes in the 2006 election, it would receive $1.95 million in an allowance in 2008, paid quarterly.

 

View Full Study in PDF Format (10 pages) –

FB066 What Saved the Bloq Quebecois

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

At first glance, using highly variable, intermittent, inexpensive renewable energy to produce hydrogen for energy supply stabilization seems logical. However, renewable energy is not always readily available. The concept of hydrogen as a ‘buffer,’ akin to a battery,...

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...

Residential School Recrimination, Repentance, and Reality

Residential School Recrimination, Repentance, and Reality

Allegations of widespread abuse against children who were said to have been forced to attend Canada’s Indian Residential Schools were uncommon before the last of them was shuttered in 1996. That was the year the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples...