Centralized Planning Poses Significant Challenges for First Responders to Disaster Situations: Frontier Centre study argues solutions that privilege grass roots

Bureaucratic, centralized disaster responses have a long history of failure.
Published on December 7, 2011

Executive Summary

• Following a natural disaster, the road to recovery presents considerable communication and co-ordination challenges.

• Though the traditional conception of disaster aid emphasizes the role of government, large, public, centralized initiatives have repeatedly proven ineffective.

• The reason these centralized initiatives fail is not unique to the particular agency or crisis. It is inherent in the bureaucratic structure of the organizations. It is symptomatic of larger communication and co-ordination issues.

• Supporting and propagating decentralized, community-based disaster preparedness is essential for ensuring successful recovery. At its root, rebuilding is an individual enterprise.

Over the past few months, we have witnessed enormous destruction in the wake of natural disasters. According to the Geneva-based Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, around 42-million people were displaced worldwide by natural disasters in 2010.1 Tornados, famines, tsunamis, fires and earthquakes are a fixture of the evening news, devastating communities and inspiring donations and volunteerism from onlookers. Every natural disaster draws a predictable reaction: there is compassion for those affected; there are stories of heroism from those stirred to act; and there is criticism of government responses.

Government bureaucracies are personnel- and resource-rich heavyweights, but the nature of their decision-making process makes it difficult for them to act effectively. Though centralized disaster recovery efforts are well-meaning, rebuilding is by nature an individual enterprise. Churches, neighbourhood associations and small companies have the advantage of specialized knowledge acquired through day-to- day operation and the immeasurable motivation of their own self-preservation.

Although we cannot control natural disasters, we can control our responses by preparing for known risks and by increasing our understanding of past crises.2 Communication, low-level leadership and a renewed emphasis from government and media on the importance of bottom-up rebuilding are crucial in facilitating disaster recovery. Disaster relief is most successful when government and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) communicate with one another and act in a way that does not impede the grassroots efforts that are often the most effective first responders.

View as PDF (13 pages)

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

At first glance, using highly variable, intermittent, inexpensive renewable energy to produce hydrogen for energy supply stabilization seems logical. However, renewable energy is not always readily available. The concept of hydrogen as a ‘buffer,’ akin to a battery,...

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...

Residential School Recrimination, Repentance, and Reality

Residential School Recrimination, Repentance, and Reality

Allegations of widespread abuse against children who were said to have been forced to attend Canada’s Indian Residential Schools were uncommon before the last of them was shuttered in 1996. That was the year the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples...