The Work from Home Revolution: Data and Policy Implications

The rise of remote and hybrid work has brought about a significant shift in how people access employment opportunities, reducing the need for physical commuting. This article examines the latest […]
Published on December 1, 2023

The rise of remote and hybrid work has brought about a significant shift in how people access employment opportunities, reducing the need for physical commuting. This article examines the latest data for major metropolitan areas in the United States (with over one million residents) from 2019 to 2022, highlighting the transition from previous work modes to working from home (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Overall, major metropolitan area employment increased by 1.9% from 2019 to 2022, slightly below the national increase of 2.3% (Figure 2). Among these metros, there was a remarkable 202% increase in the number of people working from home during this period.

The most significant decline was observed in transit, with a substantial 36% decrease. Bicycling and driving alone also saw losses of 10.3% and 10.0%, respectively, while walking experienced a 9% reduction. Carpooling showed a minor loss at 1.2%. The only category that saw an increase apart from working from home was the “other” category, encompassing motorcycles, taxicabs and others.

In all major metropolitan areas, the market share of working from home doubled or even more (Figure 3). The most significant gains in remote work were witnessed in San Jose (395%), Washington (305%), Seattle (395%), Buffalo (274%), and Detroit (269%). New Orleans had the smallest gain at 100%. Riverside – San Bernardino (103%), Tucson (118%), Fresno (130%), and Miami (135%) also had comparatively small gains in remote work.

Data for Major Metropolitan Areas

Only one major metropolitan area, Fresno, showed an increase “driving alone” (Figure 4), with a modest gain of 1%. The smallest losses in this category were observed in Riverside-San Bernardino (1%), Birmingham (3%), Tucson (3%), and Oklahoma City (4%). On the other hand, the most significant declines in driving alone were recorded in San Jose (22%), Hartford (17%), Los Angeles (15%), San Francisco (14%), and Minneapolis-St. Paul (14%).

Carpooling outperformed driving alone, with the largest increases (Figure 5) seen in Louisville (19%), Jacksonville (19%), Riverside-San Bernardino (19%), Houston (18%), and Honolulu (18%). The largest market share losses for carpooling occurred in New Orleans (24%), San Jose (21%), Detroit (20%), Seattle (18%), and Washington (18%).

Transit saw the most substantial market share loss, with significant declines (Figure 6). However, two metropolitan areas experienced increases, with Birmingham at 9% and Hartford at 4%. The most significant transit market share losses were in Sacramento (64%), San Jose (61%), San Francisco (60%), Richmond (60%), and Louisville (59%).

While bicycle commuting had an overall loss, several metropolitan areas saw substantial market share increases (Figure 7), with the most significant one in Fresno (98%). Other areas with notable gains included Providence (64%), Honolulu (55%), Nashville (49%), and Memphis (48%). The largest bicycle commuting losses were in Buffalo (54%), Austin (48%), Orlando (48%), Portland (42%), and Sacramento (41%).

Walking saw significant increases (Figure 8) in Raleigh (51%), Oklahoma City (32%), Richmond (30%), Tulsa (29%), and Salt Lake City (22%). Conversely, the most substantial walking losses were in Hartford (34%), Louisville (31%), Virginia Beach-Norfolk (29%), Columbus (27%), and Tampa-St. Petersburg (24%).

The largest gains (Figure 9) in the “other” category (including motorcycles, taxicabs, and other modes) were in Grand Rapids (128%), Fresno (83%), Houston (78%), Kansas City (78%), and Providence (64%). On the other hand, the most significant losses in this category were in Birmingham (64%), San Francisco (22%), Tulsa (20%), Jacksonville (18%), and Tucson (18%).

Public Policy Implications: Past and Future

The shift towards remote work has significantly altered the dynamic between employees and employers. Over the past six decades, government policies have sought to attract drivers out of their cars and in to transit through subsidies that have reduced fares, expanded services, and built costly rail systems. Transit subsidies exceeded $1.5 trillion (adjusted for inflation) through 2018. Despite these substantial contributions, between 1960 and 2019, transit commuting declined by approximately 30,000 daily one-way trips. At the same time commuting by car saw an increase of 90 million daily one-way commuters. From a mathematical perspective, the significant subsidies to transit did not succeed in attracting a single driver.

In stark contrast, nearly 9 million commuters switched from cars to working from home between 2019 and 2022. This remarkable shift occurred with virtually no subsidies (Figure 10), signifying the appeal and viability of remote work arrangements.

A recent New York Times, commentary titled “The Five Day Office Week is Dead” by Professor Nicholas Bloom of Stanford University expresses optimism about the future expansion of working from home. Bloom and his colleagues have observed a growing trend in patent applications that support remote work and noted the increased acceptance of remote work in startup companies. These emerging trends seem likely to auger well for the decades to come.

 

Wendell Cox is a Senior Fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

 

Related Items:

Watch: Leaders on the Frontier – Housing Demand Exceeds Supply With Wendell Cox & Charles Blain

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

Newfoundland’s Constitutional Challenge is Mistaken

The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has recently announced its intention to mount a constitutional challenge relating to equalization. This decision has been justified by arguments that are not accurate and displays a lack of understanding of the...

It Seems We Are Far Too Canadian; Yet Not Canadian Enough

It Seems We Are Far Too Canadian; Yet Not Canadian Enough

Oh, Canada. You have been too nice.  Too kind.  Too silent. For too long. And now a noisy minority is undermining our country’s values, laws and institutions. Protestors have taken over many university campuses and they are fomenting hatred toward Jews and Israel. Few...

In Powell River, What’s In A Name?

In Powell River, What’s In A Name?

Powell River is flowing toward a name change. Juliet in Shakespeare’s famous play Romeo and Juliet says “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” – just not to the good people of Powell River where the prospect of a new name is stirring up a hornet’s nest. The...