The censorship and institutional capture evident in the pandemic should be an ongoing concern for policy-makers, scientists, and the medical field. Someone who encountered this first-hand was clinical trials researcher Sabine Hazan, who testified to the National Citizens Inquiry on COVID-19.
Hazan, the CEO and principal investigator at Venture Clinical Trials is also the founder and CEO of Progena Biome, a genetic sequencing lab. Starting in 2020, she subjected stool samples of COVID-19 patients’ to next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the entire genome of the virus.
It wasn’t long before the tests, which were $3,000 each, showed the virus mutating into four different spike proteins. Patients had anywhere from one to all of them.
“‘How is the vaccine going to work if the spike protein itself is mutating into multiple combinations?’” she asked herself.
“Vaccinating against viruses is not a really a good idea because unfortunately, viruses mutate more than bacteria.”
Hazan was curious about three cases where the virus had completely disappeared by day five. Two of these patients said they had been taking hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
On April 2, 2020, Hazan submitted a protocol to treat COVID-19 consisting of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, vitamins C, D, and zinc. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a request to do clinical trials within 24 hours, yet Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram blocked her advertisements for patients.
The few patients Hazan could recruit faced another hurdle as medical authorities warned pharmacists not to prescribe hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin together because of cardiac problems. Her monitoring of patients never revealed such problems.
“These drugs have been given to millions of people with arthritis, and all of a sudden, they’re bad?” she asked.
In the first 16 of 17 patients, the virus disappeared from stool samples between 5 to 8 days after being on the regimen. Hazan applied for a patent for her protocol in July 2020 and received it in December 2020. An unnamed party or parties offered her $10 million, then $40 million for her patent, but refused the money to continue her research.
Hazan found newborns have a lot of bifidobacteria and the elderly have little to none. Her research suggests that boosting a person’s microbiomes can address c difficile, anxiety, Lyme Disease, Crohn’s, psoriasis, Alzheimer’s, and cancer, while its deficiencies may be related to autism.
She had concerns from the vaccines from the start, but authorities kept doctors in California like her from warning patients about possible side effects.
“What I realized doing clinical trials is I couldn’t always trust pharmaceutical companies,” she said.
“When people are coming at me with a new medication that has been tested on animals for one week, I start freaking out.”
Some of her studies waited 6 to 8 months to get published, while 52 have not yet found a journal willing to print them.
“I’m trying to publish the data on the messenger RNA [of COVID vaccines] affecting the microbiome, which won a Research Award at the American College of Gastro[enterology], and nobody’s interested in publishing that.”
This study of more than 150 vaccine-injured patients found the entire phylum of bifidobacteria had been “wiped” out.
Frontiers in Microbiology published her most popular paper, Microbiome-Based Hypothesis on Ivermectin’s Mechanism in COVID-19: Ivermectin Feeds Bifidobacteria to Boost Immunity in July of 2022. The paper received 47,000 views before a complaint led to its retraction in May of 2023.
Twitter deemed her hypothesis as “misinformation” long before the retraction and blocked her account. Some of Hazan’s own patients who worked for Twitter helped get her account reinstated but could not keep her from a ‘misinformation’ label on her posts.
“I was doing the clinical trials. I was treating the patients, I was analyzing the stools. I was working with the FDA. Who’s giving misinformation? I’m publishing. You’re telling me I’m misinforming people?” she recalled thinking.
Hazan expressed concern that a “movement” to retract papers has yanked more than 14,000 of them and artificial intelligence will ignore them.
“What’s interesting about these papers is they all go against the narrative that is meant to sell you something. So that’s dangerous…if you’re trying to push a drug, or biologic, and now you’re removing everything else,” she said.
Such one-sided medical dogma is wrong, she insisted.
“That’s not science. That’s propaganda. That’s what we saw this pandemic,” said Hazan.
“Now I’m blacklisted from a lot of pharmaceutical companies…It actually killed my business of doing clinical trials.”
The fact that mRNA vaccines are still being pushed concerns the Moroccan-born doctor.
“You talk to scientists who do animal studies on the mRNA, they will tell you that the rats are eating their arms. So that’s all I need to hear,” she said.
“The technology may be promising, maybe, but it’s not there yet. It’s still very much experimental.”
Let’s hope more scientists, doctors, and journal publishers will find the integrity and courage of Hazan. Citizens have reason for concern that regulators have pushed risky mRNA vaccines while undermining the legitimacy of other promising options. When will honest science prevail?
Lee Harding is Research Fellow for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
Related Items:
Watch Dr. Sabine Hazan’s testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry here. (91 minutes) May 31, 2024.
