Why Are Parents Paying Twice?

Manitoba's education system is soaking parents who choose not to enroll their children in often substandard public schools. Those who use independent schools, who home-school and who use remedial learning centres all face discrimination and two tiers.
Published on October 5, 2006

 

Executive Summary

  • A significant and growing minority of parents choose alternative education options for their children.
  • The most common alternatives are independent schools, homeschooling and supplementary tutoring.
  • Currently, more than 14 000 students are enrolled at independent schools in Manitoba, which receive only half of the per-capita resources allocated to public schools do. Tuition fees make up the difference.
  • Giving parents more control of this funding, so that the money follows the child, would make independent schools an option available to all, not just the affluent.
  • Approximately 1,500 students in Manitoba are homeschooled. They may be receiving a higher quality of education than most public school students, with no government funding at all.
  • If the government paid for the curriculum costs of home-schooled students to a maximum of $1,000, taxpayers would still save $7,000 per year over the cost of educating that child in the public school system, and homeschooling would be financially viable for more Manitoba families.
  • Many children in public schools are performing below grade level. Parents with the means often purchase additional tutoring or remedial schooling. Private tutoring services have excellent track records and provide guarantees that students enrolled with them will show measurable improvement quickly.
  • Public school divisions should be required to pay for independent-school tutoring for students who are significantly behind the average achievement levels for their grade. Remedial tutoring should be available to all who need it, not only those who can afford it.
  • Holding public schools responsible for the costs of supplementary tutoring would encourage them to be more vigilant in ensuring that students are well-educated.
  • Parents who choose alternative education options should not be required to pay for their children’s education twice. The ability to choose the education best suited to their child’s needs should not be restricted to the wealthy.

Full Backgrounder in PDF

 

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Groupthink on School Boards is Not Inclusive

Groupthink on School Boards is Not Inclusive

The recent by-election in the Louis Riel School Division (LRSD) attracted a lot of media attention, much more than usual. That’s because this was the seat vacated last November by former Ward 1 trustee Francine Champagne. To say that her short tenure was controversial...

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

Why We Should Be Skeptical Of The Hydrogen Economy

At first glance, using highly variable, intermittent, inexpensive renewable energy to produce hydrogen for energy supply stabilization seems logical. However, renewable energy is not always readily available. The concept of hydrogen as a ‘buffer,’ akin to a battery,...

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

Keep or Can the New Canada Water Agency?

In May, the federal government announced it was creating a new organization called the Canada Water Agency.   It will have a 5-year budget of $85 million, staff of 215, half of which will be located at a new headquarters in Winnipeg. This is part of a broader effort...