A Thread Down a Football Field

An analysis of why the west side transmission line in Manitoba is sub-optimal environmental and energy policy.
Published on December 17, 2007


Manitoba Hydro is Manitoba’s largest Crown corporation and is responsible for providing low cost electricity to Manitobans. It is also a major exporter of hydroelectric power to the United States. Since the turn of the 20th century, Manitoba Hydro has been developing hydroelectric resources by building power generation facilities on a number of major rivers. Producing electricity requires a means to transport it, and Manitoba Hydro is responsible for the construction and operation of transmission facilities such as power lines and converter stations.

To keep up with demand, Manitoba Hydro must constantly increase both generation and transmission capacity. There are two major lines coming down from Northern Manitoba, BiPoles I and II. BiPole III is in the planning stage, and the original intention was to run that line down the east side of Lake Winnipeg (ESLW). Due to pressure from a select group of environmentalists, this plan was shelved in favour of a line down the west side of Lake Winnipegosis (WSLW) near the Saskatchewan border.

The WSLW line is much longer, and the extra distance will result in a line loss of at least 28 megawatts (MW) per year, which is enough to power 25,000 homes, about equivalent to all the residences in Brandon. The export value of this line loss is in the hundreds of millions of dollars over the expected 50-year life of the transmission line.

The environmental impact of BiPole III on the ESLW would have been minimal and easily mitigated. The land under the power line would have provided excellent wildlife habitat and would have introduced plant diversity into an area with little. Certain species of wildlife would have thrived in this new habitat.

It is evident that such poor quality decisions are only possible because the government of Manitoba is the recipient of generous equalization payments from have provinces that are net contributors to the Equalization Program.

Read the complete paper in PDF format

Featured News


Invest in Roads Not Transit

Invest in Roads Not Transit

The jury is still out in Winnipeg: should governments be spending money on roads or more public transit? Well, a new policy brief from the Frontier Centre show that the sooner governments abandon their bias against cars the better. A recent University of Toronto paper...

Multiple More Jobs Accessible by Automobile than By Transit

Multiple More Jobs Accessible by Automobile than By Transit

• A recent University of Toronto paper by Jeff Allen and Steven Farber examines work access as measured in travel time to get to work. The “30-minute job access” is a rounded-up average in all heavily populated regions in Canada. • The 2021 census revealed that...

How ‘Green’ Projects Are Looting the Treasury

How ‘Green’ Projects Are Looting the Treasury

The most egregious theft of collective wealth and well-being -- and it is flat-out theft -- is the churn on “alternative” forms of energy production. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama said last week in an interview with Steve Bannon that the U.S. has spent some $7...