Modernizing Treaty Annuities – A Policy Blueprint

Almost all aspects of the historical treaties signed between Indian bands and the Crown between 1850 and 1921 have been modernized over the past forty years. The notable exception is […]
Published on January 8, 2020

Almost all aspects of the historical treaties signed between Indian bands and the Crown between 1850 and 1921 have been modernized over the past forty years. The notable exception is the treaty annuity, the single provision in the treaties specifically benefiting individuals within the collective. Annuities are, today, $4 or $5 per person, unchanged from when the treaties were signed.

The historic treaties contained two key livelihood support provisions to provide individuals and families a degree of economic and political independence within the collective: the right to continue to hunt, fish, trap and otherwise pursue traditional activities on ceded lands, and annuities payable to every man, woman, and child belonging to those bands.

By federal government policy, annuities are paid directly to eligible recipients in the amount of $4 or $5 per year, either in cash or by cheque. The current Indian Act is silent on the valuing the annuity, how it is administered, and who is deemed eligible. These issues are a matter of government policy.

Read the entire Policy Blueprint here. 

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Why Canada Still Deserves A Cheer

Why Canada Still Deserves A Cheer

Senior Fellow Gerry Bowler says it’s time to stop apologizing and start celebrating. Canada has pioneered peace, democracy, and invention—from insulin to instant replay—while offering a better path on Indigenous relations than most of the world. So why the shame? Bowler urges Canadians to stand tall this Dominion Day and reclaim their pride.

Court Ruling On Indigenous Title Threatens Private Property Rights

Court Ruling On Indigenous Title Threatens Private Property Rights

Joseph Quesnel examines the growing conflict between Indigenous rights and private property ownership. Using the 2024 dispute between the Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation and the Town of South Bruce Peninsula as a case study, he warns that governments and Indigenous groups must collaborate before court cases escalate. Quesnel calls for universal rules on land ownership to prevent confusion and proposes constitutionalizing property rights to secure fair resolution. Click to read more on how this legal battle could reshape Canada’s property landscape.