Air Canada Needs Travellers, Not Bailouts

A year and a half into the COVID-19 pandemic, the only thing keeping Air Canada alive is the federal-government bailouts. They are delaying the inevitable and sensible way out: cutting […]
Published on September 14, 2021

A year and a half into the COVID-19 pandemic, the only thing keeping Air Canada alive is the federal-government bailouts. They are delaying the inevitable and sensible way out: cutting travel restrictions, encouraging tourism by ensuring effective containment and encouraging vaccination. 

In April 2021, Ottawa granted the firm another $5.9 billion loan to keep it afloat until passengers can start flying again. Air Canada has vowed to refund ticket holders, restore regular services in airports, and hire back laid-off personnel when normalcy returns. 

Unlike with previous loans, the federal government is now a shareholder of the company; it disbursed $500 million to purchase shares at $23 each as a way to guarantee repayment. The price per share before the pandemic was $50. 

Canada’s Finance Minister has argued taxpayers will benefit from stock returns as vaccinations rise and restrictions ease. However, Air Canada’s recovery looks distant. As tourism remains dormant, particularly with all of the spillover effects for the rest of the economy—taxpayers continue to foot a ballooning bill.

In 2020, Air Canada shrunk more than 50 per cent of its workforce, cut salaries and received an emergency subsidy to keep the rest of its payroll. In 2021, while the rest of the world overcomes the pandemic and opens up, the unprofitable company will rely on aid to survive another year. 

Air Canada’s passenger load declined by 73 per cent in 2020, resulting in a $4.65 billion loss for the company. In contrast, Air Canada recorded a profit of $1.48 billion in 2019.

With a revenue drop of 50 per cent, the airline was unable to meet its obligations. Air Canada fired around 200,000 workers and reduced the salaries of 3,200 management employees.

The two highest executives also waived all their wages for April, May and June of 2020 and halved their salaries for the next six months. Three other executives cut their wages in half for the first three months of 2020 and then received a 20 per cent haircut for the rest of the year.

Air Canada also delayed paying financial liabilities. For instance, the US Treasury Department filed a complaint against the company early this month due to delays in client refunds. The US government entity sought a US$25.5 million fine for the delays. 

Although the company achieved $1.7 billion in savings in 2020 and decreased its planned capital spending from 2020 to 2023 by $3 billion, Air Canada is still on the tightrope. 

According to its September 2020 balance sheet, Air Canada was $26.84 billion in debt, of which $7.24 billion was due within a year. Liabilities outweighed the sum of Air Canada’s cash and near-term receivables by $18.6 billion.

In light of the risky debt increase, Fitch Ratings downgraded the company’s long-term issuer default score to B+ from BB-. The rating agency forecasts Air Canada’s debt to increase until 2022 and revenues to remain below 2019 levels until 2024. 

In its statement, Fitch Ratings pointed out that leisure travel has the potential to trigger recovery. Indeed, US-focused carriers have performed better than Air Canada because of their higher exposure to business, interstate, and international travel.

Rather than subsisting on government aid, Air Canada should be urging government officials to ease travel restrictions as the industry can no longer withstand grounding most of its aircraft.

According to Statistics Canada, travel restrictions reduced gross domestic product for the tourism industry by nearly half in 2020. In the same vein, tourism jobs fell by 28.7 per cent.

Travel restrictions also led to significant losses in other industries. They resulted in a reduction of at least 1.2 per cent of Canada’s GDP and in the loss of up to 500,000 jobs.

Issuing debt and getting new liabilities without sufficient operating cash flows is only postponing an inevitable default. If Air Canada’s managers stand by idly, taxpayers will bear the brunt. 

Thousands of jobs and businesses that have been able to survive until now are at stake too. Officials cannot delay the decision any longer, because recovery is not immediate. 

Air Canada would need to first pay off looming liabilities and incur maintenance costs for grounded aircraft. Only then can the company start to see growing net income and benefit shareholders with higher valuations

A blank check from the federal government is a recipe for stagnation, which is a death knell in a highly competitive industry like aviation. Unless it can turn this around before other players resume normal travel, Air Canada is on a path to becoming another taxpayer-subsidized white elephant. 

 

Paz Gómez is a research associate with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. 

Photo by John McArthur on Unsplash.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

When Did Canada Become “Turtle Island” – And Why?

When Did Canada Become “Turtle Island” – And Why?

Changing a country’s name never raised any eyebrows when it involved third world colonies transitioning to sovereignty, as occurred when many in sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere after World War II did so. But such transformations have been virtually non-existent when...

Etam: 444,000 Semi-loads of Food? Just Another Day on Planet Earth

Etam: 444,000 Semi-loads of Food? Just Another Day on Planet Earth

A friend of mine, always with a keen eye on interesting things, passed on an interesting quote from the CERA Week energy conference the other week. The head of the International Energy Forum mentioned a surprising statistic, as quoted by Javier Blas on Twitter:...