Simpson on Universities

Jeffrey Simpson contributes his two cents to the university debate. While his commentary is useful, it does mix up the concept of inputs and outcomes.  If we genuinely want to […]
Published on June 19, 2011

Jeffrey Simpson contributes his two cents to the university debate.

While his commentary is useful, it does mix up the concept of inputs and outcomes.  If we genuinely want to reform the effectiveness of universities and their ability to deliver effective undergraduate education, we will make the fees they receive dependent on the increased earning capacity of their graduates.  If university professors and executives had their majority of their income determined by how well their graduates perform in the job market, perhaps the meat grinder model of undergraduate education may be re-thought

 

 

 

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Micromanaging School Boards is the Wrong Approach

Micromanaging School Boards is the Wrong Approach

Remember Bill 64? Introduced in 2021 by the former Progressive Conservative government, Bill 64 proposed to abolish locally elected school boards. The NDP led the charge against this bill. Current education minister Nello Altomare, then serving as his party’s...

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

It’s Canada Day. A day that used to be a celebration of cherished values like kindness and compassion, acceptance and tolerance, quiet strength and dignity, and a work hard/play hard ethic. Today, I am celebrating the very fine Canadian men and women I have met since...

Groupthink on School Boards is Not Inclusive

Groupthink on School Boards is Not Inclusive

The recent by-election in the Louis Riel School Division (LRSD) attracted a lot of media attention, much more than usual. That’s because this was the seat vacated last November by former Ward 1 trustee Francine Champagne. To say that her short tenure was controversial...