$11.2 billion in 2009

Whether one uses 1996 or 2001 as the baseline from which to measure Alberta's program spending, the result is that Alberta has consistently spent far more than inflation and population growth would justify.
Published on April 3, 2009

Welcome back to the era of Miami Vice, Huey Lewis & the News — and Deficits

Now that Alberta has entered the fiscal red zone — Alberta’s third quarter update forecast a $1.5 billion deficit instead of the $1.5 billion surplus predicted in last year’s budget — it’s useful to ask how the province ended back up in the Don Getty years.

After racking up an impressive 14-year record of surpluses (which ranged from $938 million in fiscal 1995 to a high of $8.5 billion in both the 2006 and 2007 budget years), the province is now back in a deficit position. The reason for that is not merely low oil and gas prices — Alberta balanced the books both when oil and natural gas prices were high (2006 and 2007) and when prices were low (early in this decade). The reason for Alberta’s newest deficit is that program spending has expanded well beyond combined inflation and population growth — as the accompanying three tables and graphs will document.

View the Entire Study in PDF Format (9 Pages)

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Cut Corporate Income Taxes Massively to Increase Growth, Prosperity

Cut Corporate Income Taxes Massively to Increase Growth, Prosperity

The federal Liberal government’s current budget proposal budget proposal to increase the inclusion rate for capital gains tax was met with justifiable criticism and opposition - primarily from business groups.  There is another corporate income tax increase looming. ...