Federal Court ruling shows problems inherent in First Nation custom elections

In an apparent vindication of the rule of law, a Federal Court ruling has temporarily put an end to a dispute on Bearspaw First Nation, a band located in southern […]
Published on June 28, 2011

In an apparent vindication of the rule of law, a Federal Court ruling has temporarily put an end to a dispute on Bearspaw First Nation, a band located in southern Alberta. The judge ordered chief and council from office pending an election within 60 days.

Problems erupted in the community when Chief David Bearspaw and his band council extended their terms from two years to four years and cancelled a scheduled 2010 band election.

There is merit to the idea of longer terms for band chiefs and councillors. Some argue it allows First Nation politicians to develop strategic vision and actually achieve meaningful change, rather than worry about constantly being forced into re-election mode. On the other hand, some contend it allows these politicians to do more damage under existing less than ideal governance structures.

The merit of the extension, however, is not at issue. It is the arbitrary nature of the change. The chief and council claim the move was endorsed in a survey which had a very low turnout and they had support of elders. However, the judge found that the chief and council manipulated tradition to their advantage.

“The evidence points to one conclusion, that the Chief and Council, with the aid of their staff, designed and executed the survey through a carefully chosen group of Elders dominated by members of the Chief’s family.”

Bearspaw is under what is known as a custom election, which means they  opt out of the Indian Act provisions on band elections and adopt their own rules. The code has to be approved and in accord with basic principles of fairness and democracy. However, the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs cannot intervene after the custom code is set down.

This is why bands who run into problems with wayward custom councils, like on Bearspaw, have only one resort in the Federal Court, which is costly and divisive.

In the past, I argued the establishment of a First Nation-led, but independent and impartial, appeals process is a better alternative to court battles.

This case demonstrates why that argument is more relevant than ever.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

Most Canadians are unaware that a campaign to remake Canada is underway. The conception of that most Canadians have of their country - that it is, one nation, in which citizens of different ethnic, religious and racial groups are all treated equally, under one set of...

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

It’s Canada Day. A day that used to be a celebration of cherished values like kindness and compassion, acceptance and tolerance, quiet strength and dignity, and a work hard/play hard ethic. Today, I am celebrating the very fine Canadian men and women I have met since...

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

The Canadian House of Commons designated June as National Aboriginal History Month in 2009. The name was changed to National Indigenous History Month in 2017. The theme of the first week of this year’s effort to “honour the stories, achievements and resilience of...