First Nation financial accountability good for many reasons

Some First Nation leaders are already challenging different aspects of the government’s new financial disclosure law for First Nation leaders. The bill will require chiefs and councillors to declare their […]
Published on November 25, 2011

Some First Nation leaders are already challenging different aspects of the government’s new financial disclosure law for First Nation leaders. The bill will require chiefs and councillors to declare their salaries and expenses.

In our fourth annual Aboriginal Governance Index, we asked First Nation respondents in participating bands across the Prairies to what extent financial statements and business plans are made available to members (pg. 32 of report). While 35 per cent gave a positive response to this question, 40 per cent gave a negative response. This is a troublingly high minority.

In our travels onto various Prairie-based reserves, we often hear stories of lack of transparency. Some may be inaccurate, but with so many anecdotal accounts, some of them must be based on the truth.

This bill does not mandate how much band leaders receive or how they are compensated for various things. It just provides  transparency to what is happening.

One complaint we hear on reserves is chief and council holding meetings off-reserve or about unexplained trips.

No one disputes many First Nation leaders earn what they receive and that their job is demanding. They are often on 24 hour call.

First Nation communities that understand that will respect what their leaders earn.

But, there is nothing wrong in having a spotlight. All politicians face this. Ridiculous expenses are brought to light. Trips on exclusive aircraft are challenged.

Indigenous communities, by and large, are not defined by  clear fiscal and political relationship of accountability between leader and citizen. Until that is achieved, band members at least are entitled to disclosure so they can decide what is fair compensation for their leaders.

Apparently, the Ministry is making disclosure a requirement for government funds. This may seem harsh and perhaps there is room for flexibility, but there have to be consequences for not being transparent.

Moreover, those First Nations that are on the ball know that transparent governance is better for solid business investment. This was mentioned when the bill was introduced on Wednesday. In the end, this kind of transparency will pay dividends for First Nation economic development.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

Most Canadians are unaware that a campaign to remake Canada is underway. The conception of that most Canadians have of their country - that it is, one nation, in which citizens of different ethnic, religious and racial groups are all treated equally, under one set of...

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

It’s Canada Day. A day that used to be a celebration of cherished values like kindness and compassion, acceptance and tolerance, quiet strength and dignity, and a work hard/play hard ethic. Today, I am celebrating the very fine Canadian men and women I have met since...

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

The Canadian House of Commons designated June as National Aboriginal History Month in 2009. The name was changed to National Indigenous History Month in 2017. The theme of the first week of this year’s effort to “honour the stories, achievements and resilience of...