Re-thinking Indian status?

A flood of applications for Indian Status in Newfoundland should lead policy makers to re-think how they define membership criteria. In particular, the definition should be as limited as possible and ensure it only includes genuine members.
Published on May 9, 2013

The federal government is concerned about the flood of applications they have received for Newfoundland Mi’kmaq status.

In the fall of 2011, Aboriginal Affairs granted official Indian Act status to the group after denying Aboriginal title in Newfoundland since its entry into Confederation.

The government has received an unanticipated 100,000 application, more than one-fifth of Newfoundland’s total population, according to media accounts.

Some claim much of the claims are embellished. Liz LaSaga, a leader of the Qalipu First Nation, said that some of the claimants were merely seeking the benefits that come with Indian status.

This would involve access to extended health benefits and aid for education.

Some could argue that minimizing what benefits one could receive from this status would limit the incentives to make an embellished claim.

Some analysts have observed that the number of Metis applicants has risen dramatically over the years due to some who merely seek some benefits. The recent court decision affirming that Metis and non-Status Indians should be recognized as “Indians” as part of S. 91 (24) of the Constitution may also increase membership applications.

However, the membership criteria itself seems quite wide. Those applying only needed to provide some evidence of Aboriginal ancestry. Applicants did not need to live in Newfoundland and only needed to assure the enrolment committee that aboriginal heritage was “more likely than unlikely.”

Of course, there just may be many members who have never claimed their heritage for whatever reason.

The preferred policy option for government is to limit the definition to the most legitimate claims and prevent those who would embellish or falsify a claim from ever doing so.

That will keep down costs and ensure the status actually means something.

Featured News

MORE NEWS

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

Most Canadians are unaware that a campaign to remake Canada is underway. The conception of that most Canadians have of their country - that it is, one nation, in which citizens of different ethnic, religious and racial groups are all treated equally, under one set of...

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

What Does Canada Day Mean Today?

It’s Canada Day. A day that used to be a celebration of cherished values like kindness and compassion, acceptance and tolerance, quiet strength and dignity, and a work hard/play hard ethic. Today, I am celebrating the very fine Canadian men and women I have met since...

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

National Indigenous History Month Should Promote Truth Telling

The Canadian House of Commons designated June as National Aboriginal History Month in 2009. The name was changed to National Indigenous History Month in 2017. The theme of the first week of this year’s effort to “honour the stories, achievements and resilience of...