Indigenous Entrepreneurship in the United States of America

Native American entrepreneurship has been growing in leaps and bounds over the last few decades. As in Canada among First Nations, tribal government has often taken the lead in building […]
Published on September 10, 2018

Native American entrepreneurship has been growing in leaps and bounds over the last few decades. As in Canada among First Nations, tribal government has often taken the lead in building and cultivating tribe-owned businesses. At first, this tended to be in gaming, particularly casinos. Make no mistake, Native American casinos are big business. Tribal gaming is now is a $30B industry (from 2015 data), involving over 350 casinos operating on tribal lands in 28 states.

However, among tribes there is a growing realization that there are limits in gaming. There is a real problem of market saturation in certain areas. In other words, there are only so many people interested in gambling in a specific area. Thus, to their credit, many tribes are expanding and diversifying their economic development ventures beyond gambling (and tobacco) and into energy and resource development, as well as other areas. Some Native American tribes are capitalizing on government minority preferences to engage in government contracting. Some geographically isolated Native American tribes are looking online where some are doing very well in online financial services. Other—usually younger—Native American entrepreneurs are finding opportunities in other digital businesses. Native American and First Nations have one advantage in living together as a community—people are looking out for each other and the good of the tribe, so often revenues from Indigenous owned ventures funnel into the cost of government or other public services, or gets re-invested in other enterprises to keep the virtuous cycle of money flowing.

View the entire PDF here: FC-PS217_IndigeneousEntrep_SP2018_F2

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Trust but verify: Why COVID-19 And Kamloops Claims Demand Scientific Scrutiny

Trust but verify: Why COVID-19 And Kamloops Claims Demand Scientific Scrutiny

Senior Fellow Rodney Clifton calls for renewed scientific scrutiny of two major Canadian narratives: COVID-19 policies and the Kamloops residential school claims. He argues that both bypassed rigorous, evidence-based evaluation, favouring politicized consensus. Critics of pandemic measures, like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, were wrongly dismissed despite valid concerns. Similarly, the unverified mass grave claims in Kamloops were accepted without forensic proof. Clifton urges a return to the scientific principle of “trust but verify” to safeguard truth, public policy, and democracy.

Indigenous-led Projects Hold Key To Canada’s Energy Future

Indigenous-led Projects Hold Key To Canada’s Energy Future

A revived push for the Northern Gateway pipeline has sparked fresh debate over Indigenous-led energy development. Frontier Fellow Maureen McCall highlights how leaders like Calvin Helin and Dale Swampy argue that Canada’s energy future—and its global competitiveness—depends on Indigenous equity, regulatory reform, and responsible resource partnerships. With support growing among First Nations for LNG and pipeline projects, they are calling for the repeal of restrictive laws and the embrace of Indigenous leadership to advance both economic reconciliation and national energy security.