Settling Old Debts

Despite the recent establishment of a tribunal for settling specific claims, Canada still requires an expedited process that moves towards a final filing deadline for all specific land claims.
Published on November 20, 2008

 

Executive Summary

• Some of the major flashpoints in Native government confrontations involve issues related to specific claims, such as Oka and the ongoing Caledonia standoff in southern Ontario.

• Ottawa passed Bill C-30, The Specific Claims Tribunal Act, while a step in the right direction as it creates an independent tribunal with enforcement powers, limits financial awards and does not include a sunset clause for filing and resolution.

• At the current rate, a single land claim can take up to 13 years to resolve, and with a backlog of 800-1,000 claims, the process could take over 100 years.

• Unresolved land claims total between $2.6 billion and $6 billion. Some sources estimate, with the number of claims increasing annually, the value is closer to $10 billion. Such unresolved claims create tremendous economic uncertainty and prevent investment. They represent lost opportunities for First Nation communities. This is a central reason to expedite their resolution.

• Land claims are part of the “right-based agenda” for First Nations. But once this area is resolved, these communities can focus exclusively on socio-economic improvement.

• The newly created specific claims tribunal has a cap on compensation awards of $150 million. Although they are similar to courts in structure and process, they face this limit in a manner other courts do not.

• The federal government should remove the cap on financial awards and balanced that action with a sunset clause. This would show First Nations that the government is committed to justice.

• To prevent opportunism, the independent tribunal should adopt very clear and strict rules for accepting the validity of specific claims. This would counter-balance any attempts to flood the system with vexatious claims.

• To balance the proposal, First Nations would need to accept a specific claims filing and settlement deadline. Each deadline would be different, but firm in enforcement. This will bring all claims to the fore, up front, and eventually help provide finality.

• Any expedited land claims process should involve a requirement that First Nation governments provide transparent and accountable governing institutions. This means they must adopt accountability measures, similar to the First Nation Governance Act. Monies from settlements should go towards community benefit, not corrupt band structures.

• The legislation should mandate First Nation input into the choice of judges to sit on the tribunal and should consider establishing First Nation advisory councils, drawing from all regions of Canada, which provide input into which claims get adjudicated.

 

View Entire Study in PDF Format (14 pages) – 

Policy Series 51 2008Nov Settling Old Debts – LandClaims

Featured News

MORE NEWS

Sadly, AFN Remains Bad Venue for Future-Oriented Prosperity Message

Sadly, AFN Remains Bad Venue for Future-Oriented Prosperity Message

Manitoba’s First Nations should reflect on the AFN’s direction as they consider negative reactions to Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre at a recent Assembly of First Nations (AFN) meeting in Montreal. Poilievre, who in the past has boldly said we need to end the...

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

The Quiet Remaking of Canada

Most Canadians are unaware that a campaign to remake Canada is underway. The conception of that most Canadians have of their country - that it is, one nation, in which citizens of different ethnic, religious and racial groups are all treated equally, under one set of...