Over at the progressive Grist site in November, there was an article posted on the comparative advantage of North America and China in energy systems.  It makes for an interesting read.

These days the American Dream seems a touch haggard. We’ve become an anxious, ill-tempered nation of grievance-peddlers, drunk on fairy tales, waiting for someone else to solve our problems. Among other infantalizing features of modern American life is the fact that we are passive, thoughtless consumers of energy, forever suckling at a far-away teat, whether it’s foreign oil producers or politically connected corporate behemoths. We send money out of our communities; someone sends power in. We are as dependent as sheep.

A commentary on how Smart Grids require regulatory reform is posted at Reason.com, which is a monthly print magazine of “free minds and free markets.”

The obsolete electro-mechanical electric power network, built by and for a monopoly industry, cannot support the kind of growth experienced during the last 20 years in so many other industries. All that stands in the way of vibrant, customerfriendly electricity products and services is an outdated infrastructure run by hesitant monopolies and regulated by bureaucrats with little incentive to improve things. We can do smarter.

The following article was originally released in June 2009 http://fcpp.org/publication.php/2804

Moving Manitoba Towards Smart Energy

Over the last few years, the provincial government and Manitoba Hydro have tied themselves in knots trying to figure out how to get electricity from massive northern dams to southern markets.

Smart Grids could be used to support the introduction of dynamic competition and customer choice into electrical markets.  Embracing open standards and streamlining burdensome regulations are a route to that outcome.

A quick scan of blogs and media coverage of Smart Grids for electricity quickly reveals a fear of a system that could have been envisaged by Orwell.  Fears of big brother type of systems are given voice by many, including Lawrence Solomon at the National Post.

Under the so-called “smart grid” that the UK is developing, the government-regulated utility will be able to decide when and where power should be delivered, to ensure that it meets the highest social purpose. Governments may, for example, decide that the needs of key industries take precedence over others, or that the needs of industry trump that of residential consumers. Governments would also be able to price power prohibitively if it is used for non-essential purposes.

Lawrence Solomon continues to vocalize on his views that smart grids are an uneconomic, politically motived fantasy. Instead of seeing the potential for Smart Grids to usher in competitive, market-based pricing for electricity, he appears to believe that we are best served with the current rigid system where it is quite difficult to balance supply and demand.

Perhaps clarifying some of the assertions from his most recent post can help people understand the situation more clearly.

Government service delivery processes could really benefit by reviewing the Manitoba Hydro customer service system and processes as a good example of providing responsive and reliable service to the public.