Les Routledge

Pacific Nations

It should be both a national economic and national security priority to expand our ability to supply energy to our trading partners in those regions.

Featured News

To Infinity and Beyond

Space exploration is fraught with a wide variety of hazards; solar storms could irradiate astronauts, collisions with small, unseen objects could cause instant death, and the acts of both leaving Earth and coming back are high risk maneuvers that involve high speeds...

Bio-Mass Ethanol

Producing ethanol from bio-mass materials such as ag and forestry residues or purposely grown trees and grasses is proving to be a complex technology challenge.  It will be easy along the way for critics, like this one at Grist, to claim the effort is a fools errand  (see middle on comments re ethanol).  While this is a critical commentary about the technology, it may be worthwhile to review the links contained within it.

Small Farm Perspective on Policy

As an operator of a small livestock and forage farm, I keep an eye on policy developments in the broader agricultural sector.  For the most part, I have an opinion that small farmers would be better off with less government intervention and direct assistance in the agriculture sector.  I am not a fan of farm subsidies, intrusive regulations, or single desk marketing boards.

A post at GRIST presents a American “progressive  perspective” on how current farm policy discussions are moving in the United States.  It is interesting that the message in the article is small farms will benefit from functioning competitive markets and reduced direct subsidies.

Green Point – Counter Point

In my reading about green issues, I have often run across the assertion that investing in energy efficiency is a losing proposition in terms of reducing energy use.  The assertion is that as efficiency is increased, the marginal price of the good decreases, leading to overall more aggregate demand.

The New Yorker has focused attention on this assertion this week in an article written by David Owen.  The Breakthrough Institute has added some commentary on the article and has posted additional research on the topic in the past.

Foreign Investment is No Panacea

Terrence Corcoran take the government to task today in an article at the Financial Post.  He asserts that the government has muddled their priorities when it comes to promoting competition before liberalizing rules governing foreign investment.

The future promises at least another decade of tangled policy, court battles and regulatory chaos — and delayed innovation. No other outcome is possible so long as the government intends to set the policy agenda exactly backward. The plan, as frequently outlined by Industry Minister Tony Clement, is to first get all the spectrum allocated and settle all the competition issues, including installing a range of competing companies. Only then will the government look at changing foreign-ownership regulations.

Broadband – The Australian Model

The spectrum will allow the NBN Co to deploy a fixed-wireless network that will be capable of delivering minimum broadband speeds of 12 megabits per second to the last seven per cent of the nation outside the fibre footprint of the $36 billion national broadband network. The Australian

It is interesting to contrast the broadband situation in Canada to the one unfolding in Australia.  After years of being frustrated by limited competition in the market, the country elected a left-learning Labour government that decided to roll-out a broadband network controlled by the government.  Telstra, the incumbent telco operator, will not longer control access to the customer.  They were also compelled to sell their local loop assets to the new government controlled enterprise.

Smoking – Allowed Basis of Discrimination

More hospitals and medical businesses in many states are adopting strict policies that make smoking a reason to turn away job applicants, saying they want to increase worker productivity, reduce health care costs and encourage healthier living. The New York Times

Some employers argue that they have the right to avoid hiring workers who smoke or even terminate those who start because they cost the organization money in terms of lost productivity and increased health care costs.